Preacher's Study Notes 1991

Blog Archive

Tuesday, March 31, 2015

Church Discipline
by Allen Bailey

Preacher's Study Notes 1991


In this outline, I am going to explain a few of the basic verses concerning discipline. The first of this article will be spent explaining cases where a person should be withdrawn from. The latter part will deal with questions that are frequently asked regarding this important subject. I have been assigned this topic primarily to deal with a few specific questions and to explain on what occasions withdrawal of fellowship would be appropriate.

It is my strong and firm conviction that the congregations of the church of Christ should indeed enforce discipline according to the Bible. It may mean withdrawing from someone for immorality, heresy, refusing to work, etc. I will address several subjects that some will differ with. Please carefully consider as these scriptural references are explained.

This article is divided into the following divisions:
    1) Noting Objections to Church Discipline
    2) Old Testament Examples of Discipline
    3) New Testament Examples of Discipline
    4) Frequently Asked Questions About Church Discipline
    5) Conclusion.

Objections to Church Discipline
    1) We cannot judge (Matthew 7:1-5).
    2) The parable of wheat and tares prohibits discipline (Matthew 13:28ff).
    3) We cannot discipline a family member because "blood is thicker than water."
    4) It is not "Christian" to discipline anyone by not keeping company with them, not eating with them, marking and avoiding, etc.
    5) People will leave the church and other people will not come to this congregation if we enforce discipline.

These objections are discussed in this presentation. Please remember that none of these objections remove our God-given responsibility to enforce church discipline.

Old Testament Examples of Discipline
    1) Leviticus 20:10-14
    And the man that committeth adultery with another man's wife, even he that committeth adultery with his neighbour's wife, the adulterer and the adulteress shall surely be put to death. 11 And the man that lieth with his father's wife hath uncovered his father's nakedness: both of them shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them. 12And if a man lie with his daughter in law, both of them shall surely be put to death: they have wrought confusion; their blood shall be upon them. 131f a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them. 14And if a man take a wife and her mother, it is wickedness: they shall be burnt with fire, both he and they; that there be no wickedness among you.” br> br> 2) Deuteronomy 13:1-15
    If there arise among you a prophet, or a dreamer of dreams, and giveth thee a sign or a wonder, 2And the sign or the wonder come to pass, whereof he spake unto thee, saying, Let us go after other gods, which thou hast not known, and let us serve them; 3Thou shalt not hearken unto the words of that prophet, or that dreamer of dreams: for the LORD your God proveth you, to know whether ye love the LORD your God with all your heart and with all your soul. 4 You shall walk after the LORD your God, and fear Him, and keep His commandments, and obey His voice, and you shall serve Him, and cleave unto Him. 5And that prophet, or that dreamer of dreams, shall be put to death; because he has spoken to turn you away from the LORD your God, which brought you out of the land of Egypt, and redeemed you out of the house of bondage, to thrust thee out of the way which the LORD your God commanded you to walk in. So shalt thou put the evil away from your midst. 61f your brother, the son of your mother, or your son, or your daughter, or the wife of your bosom, or your friend, which is as your own soul, entice you secretly, saying, Let us go and serve other gods, which you have not known, nor your fathers; 7Namely, of the gods of the people which are round about you, nigh unto thee, or far off from thee, from the one end of the earth even unto the other end of the earth; 8You shall not consent unto him, nor hearken unto him; neither shall your eye pit him, neither shalt you spare, neither shalt thou conceal him: But thou shalt surely kill him; your hand shall be first upon him to put him to death, and afterwards the hand of all the people. 10And you shalt stone him with stones, that he die; because he has sought to thrust you away from the LoR1i your God, which brouht you out of the land of Egypt, from the house of bondage. And all Israel shall hear, and fear, and shall do no more any such wickedness as this is among you. 121f you shalt hear say in one of thy cities, which the LORD your God has given you to dwell there, saying, 13 Certain men, the children of Belial, are gone out from among you, and have withdrawn the inhabitants of their city, saying, Let us go and serve other gods, which ye have not known; 14 Then shall you inquire, and make search, and ask diligently; and, behold, if it be truth, and the thing certain, that such abomination is wrought among you; 157hou shalt surely smite the inhabitants of that city with the edge of the sword, destroying it utterly, and all that is therein, and the cattle thereof, with the edge of the sword.”

    3) Deuteronomy 21:18-24
    a man have a stubborn and rebellious son, which will not obey the voice of his father, or the voice of his mother, and that, when they have chastened him, will not hearken unto them: 19 Then shall his father and his mother lay hold on him, and bring him out unto the elders of his city, and unto the gate of his place; 20 And they shall say unto the elders of his city, This our son is stubborn and rebellious, he will not obey our voice; he is a glutton, and a drunkard. 21And all the men of his city shall stone him with stones, that he die: so shalt thou put evil away from among you; and all Israel shall hear, and fear.”

    4) Deuteronomy 22:20-25But if this thing be true, and the tokens of virginity be not found for the damsel: 21Then they shall bring out the damsel to the door of her father's house, and the men of her city shall stone her with stones that she die: because she hath wrought folly in Israel, to play the whore in her father's house: so shalt thou put evil away from among you. 221f a man be found lying with a woman married to an husband, then they shall both of them die, both the man that lay with the woman, and the woman: so shalt thou put away evil from Israel. 23If a damsel that is a virgin be betrothed unto an husband, and a man find her in the city, and lie with her; 24Then ye shall bring them both out unto the gate of that city, and ye shall stone them with stones that they die; the damsel, because she cried not, being in the city; and the man, because he hath humbled his neighbour's wife: so thou shalt put away evil from among you. 25But if a man find a betrothed damsel in the field, and the man force her, and lie with her: then the man only that lay with her shall die.

    It is clearly established in these few Old Testament cases of discipline that anyone guilty of immorality, heretics who teach false doctrine, etc. were put to death regardless of who they were. It they were your family member, son or daughter-in-law, etc., this relationship did not alter the plan of God to keep Israel pure.

    We are to press forward keeping the church pure today by continuing to implement discipline within the church. In the New Testament, there is no death penalty to be administered by the congregation; however, major disciplinary principles are to be enforced without respect of persons. God will administer the final penalty for unrepented sins by the final separation of the righteous from the wicked known as the second death (Rev. 20:14).

    New Testament Examples of Discipline

    1) Matthew 18:15-17
    Moreover if your brother shall trespass against yoiu, go and tell him his fault between you and him alone: if he shall hear you, you hast gained thy brother. 16But if he will not hear you, then take with you one or two more, that in the mouth of two or three witnesses every word may be established. 17And if he shall neglect to hear them, tell it unto the church: but if he neglect to hear the church, let him be unto you as a heathen man and a publican.”

    Trespass (hamartano): This Greek word is translated "trespass, sin, offend, buffeted for your faults" (Thayer, p. 30, Strong's #264). In the New Testament, "to wander from the law of God, violate God's law, sin." Vine's simply says this word "trespass" means "to sin" (Vine's, vol. 4, P. 154). Tell him his fault (elenko): This Greek word is translated "fault, being reproved" (Luke 3:19), "being convicted" (John 8:9), "to convince" (Titus 1:9) in the King James Version. It means "to call to account, show one his fault," demand an explanation from some one (Thayer, p. 203, Strong's #1651).

    Alone (monos): This word is translated in the King James Version, "alone" (Matthew 18:15), "only" (Matthew 4:10), "by themselves" (Mark 9:2). "Without a companion" (Thayer, p. 418, Strong's #3441). Vine's says it "denotes single, alone, solitary."

    May be established is defined by Thayer as "to ratify and confirm" (p. 308, Strong's #2476). Shall neglect to hear (parakouo): This verse is the only occasion that this Greek word is used; it is used twice in this passage. Thayer says this word means "to refuse to hear, pay no regard to, disobey" (p. 484, Strong's #3878).

    Heathen (ethnikos) is used twice (Mt. 6:7, 18:17) and is translated both times as "heathen." Thayer (p. 168, Strong's #1482) defines "heathen" as "in the New Testament, savoring of the nature of pagans, alien to the worship of the true God, heathenish; the pagan, the Gentile." Publican is defined as "a tax-gatherer, collector of taxes, or tolls" (Thayer, p. 620, Strong's #5057). Thayer says "The tax collectors were, as a class, detested not only by the Jews but by other nations also, both on account of their employment and of the harshness, greed, and deception, with which they prosecuted it."

    2) Romans 16:17-18Now I beseech you, brethren, mark them which cause divisions and offenses contrary to the doctrine which ye have learned; and avoid them. 18For they that are such serve not our Lord Jesus Christ, but their own belly; and by good words and fair speeches deceive the hearts of the simple.”

    Mark (skopeo) is defined "to look at, observe, contemplate" (Thayer, p. 579, Strong's #4648). This Greek word is also translated: "take heed" U. 11:35); "while . . . look . . . at" (2 Cor. 4:18); "considering" (Gal. 6:11); "Look. . . on" (Phil. 2:4).

    Division (dikostasia) means "dissension, division" (Thayer, p. 153, Strong's #1370). This word is only used three times in the New Testament: Rom. 16:17; 1 Cor. 3:3, "division"; Gal. 5:20, "sedition."

    Offenses (scandalon) means "to put a stumbling block in one's way. . . to cast a stumbling-block before one" (Thayer, p. 577, Strong's #4625). Thayer comments: "to cause persons to be drawn away from the true doctrine into error and sin."

    This word scandalon is also translated: "stumblingblock" (Rom. 11:9, 1 Cor. 1:23); "occasion to fall" (Rom. 14:13); "offence" (Gal. 5:11, 1 Pet. 2:7-8); "occasion of stumbling" (1 Jn. 2:10). Contrary to the doctrine: "Doctrine" is from didakee and simply means "teaching, that which is taught" (Thayer, p. 144, Strong's #1322). Didakee is also translated "hath been taught" in Titus 1:9: “Holding fast the faithful word as he hath been taught, that he may be able by sound doctrine both to exhort and to convince the gainsayers.”

    The second use of the word doctrine in Titus 1:9 simply means "teaching, instruction" (Thayer, p. 144, Strong's #1319).

    The reason disciplinary actions are to be imposed upon one who causes division and offenses contrary to the doctrine, is because he deceives the heart of the simple. "For they that are such serve not our Lord Jesus Christ, but their own belly; and by good words and fair speeches deceive the hearts of the simple" (v. 18).

    Simple (akakos) means "fearing no evil from others, distrusting no one" (Thayer, p. 20, Strong's #172).

    3) 1 Corinthians 5:1-13It is reported commonly that there is fornication among you, and such fornication as is not so much as named among the Gentiles, that one should have his father's wife. 2And you are puffed up, and have not rather mourned, that he that has done this deed might be taken away from among you. 3For I verily, as absent in body, but present in spirit, have judged already, as though I were present, concerning him that hath so done this deed, 41n the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, when ye are gathered together, and my spirit, with the power of our Lord Jesus Christ, 5To deliver such an one unto Satan for the destruction of the flesh, that the spirit may be saved in the day of the Lord Jesus. 6Your glorying is not good. Know ye not that a little leaven leaveneth the whole lump? 7Purge out therefore the old leaven, that ye may be a new lump, as ye are unleavened. For even Christ our passover is sacrificed for us: 8Therefore let us keep the feast, not with old leaven, neither with the leaven of malice and wickedness; but with the unleavened bread of sincerity and truth. I wrote unto you in an epistle not to company with fornicators: 10Yet not altogether with the fornicators of this world, or with the covetous, or extortioners, or with idolaters; for then you would need to go out of the world. But now I have written unto you not to keep company, if any man that is called a brother be a fornicator, or covetous, or an idolater, or a railer, or a drunkard, or an extortioner; with such an one no not to eat. 12For what have Ito do to judge them also that are without? do not you judge them that are within? 13But them that are without God judgeth. Therefore put away from among yourselves that wicked person.

    Not to keep company (sunanamignumi) is used three times in the New Testament and all three times has reference to discipline. This phrase means "to mix up together," "to keep company with, be intimate with" (Thayer, p. 601, Strong's #4874). It is used in verses nine and eleven, as well as in 2 Thessalonians 3:14.

    No, not to eat means "to eat with, take food together with" (Thayer, p. 604, Strong's #4906). Eat (sunesthio) is used five times in the New Testament. In each of these verses it refers to a common meal.

    “And the Pharisees and scribes murmured, saying, This man receiveth sinners, and eateth with them” (Luke 15:2).

    “Not to all the people, but unto witnesses chosen before of God, even to us, who did eat and drink with him after He rose from the dead” (Acts 10:41). “Saying, Thou wentest in to men uncircumcised, and didst eat with them” (Acts 11:3). “But now I have written unto you not to keep company, if any man that is called a brother be a fornicator, or covetous, or an idolater, or a railer, or a drunkard, or an extortioner; with such an one no not to eat” (1 Corinthians 5:11).

    “For before that certain came from James, he did eat with the Gentiles: but when they were come, he withdrew and separated himself, fearing them which were of the circumcision” (Galatians 2:12).

    Put away (exaireo) means "to lift up or take away out of a place; to remove" This Greek word is the same word as used in verse 2 of this chapter—"rnight be taken away from among you."

    Paul is directing the Corinthian congregation that this wicked person should be lifted up, removed, and taken away out of their place within the congregation. Have no company with him and do not eat with him.

    4) 1 Thessalonians 5:12-15
    “And we beseech you, brethren, to know them which labour among you, and are over you in the Lord, and admonish you; 13 And to esteem them very highly in love for their work's sake. And be at peace among yourselves. 14 Now we exhort you, brethren, warn them that are unruly, comfort the feebleminded, support the weak, be patient toward all men.”

    Warn (noutheteo) means "to admonish, warn, exhort" (Thayer, p. 429, Strong's #3560). Unruly (ataktos) means "disorderly, out of the ranks, irregular, inordinate, deviating from the prescribed order or rule" (Thayer p. 833, Strong's #813). Unruly "signifies not keep order. . . it was especially a military term, denoting not keeping rank, insubordinate; it is used in 1 Thess-alonians 5:14, describing certain church members who manifested an insubordinate spirit, whether by excitability or officiousness or idleness" (Vine's, p. 320).

    5) 2 Thessalonians 3:6-15Now we command you, brethren, in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that you withdraw yourselves from every brother that walketh disorderly, and not after the tradition which he received of us. 7For yourselves know how you ought to follow us: for we behaved not ourselves disorderly among you; 8Neither did we eat any man's bread for nought; but wrought with labour and travail night and day, that we might not be chargeable to any of you: Not because we have not power, but to make ourselves an ensample unto you to follow us. 10For even when we were with you, this we commanded you, that if any would not work, neither should he eat. For we hear that there are some which walk among you disorderly, working not at all, but are busybodies. 12Now them that are such we command and exhort by our Lord Jesus Christ, that with quietness they work, and eat their own bread. 13But you, brethren, be not weary in well doing. 14And if any man obey not our word by this epistle, note that man, and have no company with him, that he may be ashamed. 15Yet count him not as an enemy, but admonish him as a brother.”

    Withdraw yourselves (stellomai) means "to abstain from familiar intercourse with" (Thayer, p. 587, Strong's #4724).

    Walketh (peripateo) means "to regulate one's life, to conduct one's self."

    Disorderly (ataktos) is an adverb signifying, "disorderly, with slackness (like soldiers not keeping rank), 2 Thessalonians 3:6; in verse 11 it is said of those in the church who refused to work, and become busybodies" (Vine's, p. 320). Vine recommends a comparison to I Timothy 5:13: "And withal they learn to be idle, wandering about from house to house; and not only idle, but tattlers also and busybodies, speaking things which they ought not."

    Tradition (paradosis) "in 2 Thessalonians 3:6 is used of instructions concerning everyday conduct" (Vine's).

    Note means "to mark, note, distinguish by marking, to mark or not for one's self" (2 Thess. 3:14) (Thayer, p. 574, Strong's #4593).

    Have no company with (sunanamignumi) means "to mix up together. . . to keep company with, be intimate with" (cf. I Cor. 5:9, 11; 2 Thess. 3:14) (Thayer, p. 601, Strong's #4874).

    May be ashamed (entrepo): "to put to shame, in the passive voice, to be ashamed, literally means to turn in (en, 'in,' trepo, 'to turn'), that is, to turn one upon himself and so produce a feeling of shame, a wholesome shame which involves a change of conduct, I Cor. 4:14, 2 Thess. 3:14, Titus 2:8, the only places where it has this meaning" (Vine's, p. 77).

    Enemy (ekthros) means "hostile, hating and opposing" (Thayer, P. 265, Strong's #2190). Admonish (noutheteo) means "to admonish, warn, exhort."

    6) 1 Timothy 5:17-25Let the elders that rule well be counted worthy of double honour, especially they who labour in the word and doctrine. 18 For the scripture saith, Thou shalt not muzzle the ox that treadeth out the corn. And, The labourer is worthy of his reward. 19Against an elder receive not an accusation, but before two or three witnesses. 20Them that sin rebuke before all, that others also may fear. 211 charge thee before God, and the Lord Jesus Christ, and the elect angels, that thou observe these things without preferring one before another, doing nothing by partiality. 22 Lay hands suddenly on no man, neither be partaker of other men's sins: keep thyself pure. 23 Drink no longer water, but use a little wine for thy stomach's sake and thine often infirmities. 24 Some men's sins are open beforehand, going before to judgment; and some men they follow after. 25 Likewise also the good works of some are manifest beforehand; and they that are otherwise cannot be hid.”

    7) 1 Timothy 6:3-5If any man teach otherwise, and consent not to wholesome words, even the words of our Lord Jesus Christ, and to the doctrine which is according to godliness; 4 H is proud, knowing nothing, but doting about questions and strifes of words, whereof cometh envy, strife, railings, evil surmisings, 5Perverse disputings of men of corrupt minds, and destitute of the truth, supposing that gain is godliness: from such withdraw thyself.”

    Withdraw (aphisteemi): "to keep one's self away from, absent one's self from."

    8) Titus 3:10But avoid foolish questions, and genealogies, and contentions, and strivings about the law; for they are unprofitable and vain. man that is an heretic after the first and second admonition reject; Knowing that he that is such is subverted, and sinneth, being condemned of himself.”

    Heretic (hairetikos) means "schismatic, factious" (Thayer, p. 16, Strong's #141). The word "primarily denotes capable of choosing (haireomai); hence, causing division by a party spirit, factious, Titus 3:10" (Vine's, P. 217).

    Admonition (nouthesia) means "admonition, exhortation" (Thayer, p. 429, Strong's #3559).

    Reject (paraiteomai) means "to shun, avoid" (Thayer, P. 482, Strong's #3868). This Greek word is also translated as "to make excuse" U. 14:18); "refuse" (Acts 25:11, 1 Tim.4:7); "avoid" (2 Tim. 2:23).

    9) 2 John 9-11Whosoever transgresseth, and abideth not in the doctrine of Christ, has not God. He that abideth in the doctrine of Christ, he has both the Father and the Son. 101f there come any unto you, and bring not this doctrine, receive him not into your house, neither bid him God speed: "For he that biddeth him God speed is partaker of his evil deeds.”

    There is a possibility that this person coming to you bringing not this doctrine is a fallen Christian. This is indicated by the word "transgresseth."

    Frequently Asked Questions
    About Church Discipline
    1) Why Is It That Many Congregations Do Not Practice Withdrawal Of Fellowship?

    I sincerely believe there are several answers to this one question. Some congrega- tions do not practice church discipline because: a. They are not well versed on the need to enforce church discipline. Many congregations have had occasion where members should have been disciplined but failed to apply this principle, therefore doing an injustice to the erring child of God.

    b. Church discipline goes against the grain of many. People frequently try to rationalize why they don't think discipline should be enforced; for example "I want to love them back." If love did not keep them from committing these serious offenses, then I fail to see how love alone can bring them back. We must stay with the Bible.

    2) What Sins Are We To Discipline Another For?
    I believe the Scriptures makes it very clear what sins are sins that are to be disciplined: those that are specifically named in the Bible. The following list of Scriptures have been discussed as case in point for consideration: Matthew 18:15-17; Romans 16:17; 1 Corinthians 5:113; 1 Thessalonians 5:12-14; 2 Thessalonians 3:6-7; 14-15; 1 Timothy 6:3-5; Titus 3:10; 2 John 10.

    One important point to make is that all sins are not grounds for a withdrawal of fellowship. The specific sins addressed in the Bible are the grounds upon which discipline is to be enforced.

    3) In 1 Corinthians 5:11, What Does "with Such A One No Not To Eat" Mean?
    "With such a one no not to eat" refers to a common meal. It does not seem to refer to communion because the Word of God teaches us in I Corinthians 11 to "examine ourselves." We should inform all erring Christians who have been disciplined that we cannot keep company with them or eat a common meal with them. And we should always support these conversations with book, chapter and verse from the Bible.

    4) When We Discipline Erring Children Of God, Are We Not Violating Jesus' Command Not To Judge (Matthew 7:1-5)?
    No, we are not violating Jesus' command not to judge when we enforce scriptural discipline . This objection is brought up repeatedly; however, it is not a sound objection. Paul, in I Corinthians, clearly stated, "For what have I to do to judge them also that are without? do not ye judge them that are within? But them that are without God judgeth. Therefore put away from among yourselves that wicked person" (1 Corinthians 5:12-13).

    Paul is a great example of passing judgment on an erring child of God. He stated "For I verily, as absent in body, but present in spirit, have judged already, as though I were present, concerning him that hath so done this deed" (1 Corinthians 5:3). Also, Jesus said, “Judge not according to the appearance, but judge righteous judgment" (John 7:24).

    5) Should We Withdraw From An Erring Child Of God If He Commits Sins That Are Grounds For Withdrawal Of Fellowship But Quits The Church Soon Afterwards?
    Yes, if a person commits an offense that requires the congregation to enforce discipline, then the congregation should go ahead and enforce it regardless of whether the member quits or not. I would recommend withdrawal of fellowship from a member of the congregation if he has committed sins specifically named as grounds for discipline, even if he quits the church to keep you from enforcing discipline. This tactic is an escape to some, and we should not hold back in the least. If someone commits one of these offenses, and the church is in the process of enforcing discipline, and the person quits the church in the heat of the conflict, I would recommend following through with the withdrawal.

    6) Is One Congregation Duty Bound To Honor The Withdrawal Of A Member From Another Congregation?
    It is my recommendation that when one congregation disciplines someone, that the congregations in the area should honor that withdrawal of fellowship, unless they have just reason to question it.

    If a question exists whether to honor it or not, then contacting the home congregation that enforced the discipline would be in order.

    It would be very unwise to accept someone who had been disciplined, without making sure he has properly corrected the problem. It would undermine the effectiveness of discipline as ordained by the writers of the New Testament.

    Metroplex congregations are frequently faced with "church hoppers" who get upset at one place and go to another, and then to another, etc. I would like to encourage congregations to contact the previous home congregation of the individual to make sure he is in good standing. If he is not, then refuse to accept him until the member in question returns to correct the existing problems.

    7) Can One Congregation Withdraw Fellowship From A Member Of Another Congregation?
    The answer to the question is "No." I will go on record saying, however, I feel a need to qualify my answer to keep anyone from drawing the wrong conclusion. Questions along this line become very difficult at times, but I will gladly offer you my thoughts.

    A ploy is utilized by some errant Christians who are in the process of being withdrawn from. They simply change congregations! When this occasion occurs, I recommend full speed ahead, and follow through with the withdrawal of fellowship, and notify the existing home congregation that the offense had taken place.

    A case in point: One brother was being withdrawn from by congregation A. He quickly claimed to be a member of congregation B, and said, "You at congregation A cannot withdraw from me because I am not a member of that congregation." Congregation A contacted the brethren from congregation B, and said, "Is this man a member of that congregation?" Congregation B said "No!" The brother then said, "I am a member of congregation C, and you cannot withdraw fellowship from me because I am not a member of congregation A." Congregation C said, "If he is a member here, we will withdraw from him." After much conversation, it was decided that since the offense occurred at congregation A, and he left in the heat of problems, that congregation A should withdraw and congregation C said they would honor it.

    We should never allow such things to hinder or stop the congregation from applying proper measures.

    Under normal circumstances, it is not scriptural for a congregation to withdraw from a member of another congregation. Congregational autonomy fits here. For congregation A to withdraw from someone in congregation B, who may never have been a member of congregation A, would be wrong.

    8) Does The Parable Of The Tares Teach That We Should Not Enforce Discipline But _ Should Let Them Stay Until The Judgment?
    No, it does not! This parable has been taken totally out of its setting when people contend for this. Please note that in Matthew 13:24-30, 37-40, the field is the world, not the church. The wheat represents the children of God. The tares were the children of the devil. The harvest is the end of the world. There is no doubt about this situation, for Jesus interpreted this parable for us. Brethren, it concerns me when people attempt to use the parable of the tares to offset their responsibility. I do not want to question anyone's heart; however, it is a total misapplication of this parable, and it is inexcusable.

    9) What Should Be Done If One Congregation Withdraws From A Brother And Then Another Congregation Takes Him In Without Question, Or Without Insisting That The Brother Resolve The Conflict With The Previous Congregation?
    There would be a serious undermining of God's initial intentions. If a person is disciplined by a congregation, he should not have free course to go where he wants, and have people accept him as if he is white as snow.

    There is a situation of church autonomy here. The congregation that withdrew fellowship can alert the other congregation as to their actions and why; however, they cannot force the second congregation to honor their actions. Everyone will answer to God for their conduct in this situation.

    10) Is It Possible That Someone Could Be Withdrawn From Wrongfully?
    Yes, this is possible. It may have happened, but I have never known of a case. If a congregation oversteps their bounds and withdraws from a person without just cause, then a serious sitting down and talking needs to be done. It would be advisable to employ the teaching of I Corinthians 6:5, referring to finding a "wise man among you" who can judge between his brethren.

    A congregation should be very careful not to jump the gun regarding withdrawal of fellowship. One important fact that has to be present is: "It is reported commonly" (1 Corin-thians 5:1), that is, it is common knowledge. Withdrawal of fellowship should never be done unless there are clear established facts without any partiality or preferences being shown.

    11) If A Congregation Withdraws Fellowship From A Person And He Is Out Of The Church For Years, Then Shows Up And Attends Another Congregation, What Should Be Done?
    The simple approach would be to notify the congregation that the person had been withdrawn from and corrections are in order. One important factor that should never be overlooked is that time does not erase sin. Distance does not cover sin. Sin remains sins regardless of whether you live in the USA or abroad. Until sins are properly dealt with, disciplinary actions should be honored.

    12. Do We Withdraw From A Family Member Who Is Guilty Of These Specific Sins?
    Yes. Anyone who commits sins wothy of disciplinary action should be withdrawn from. This includes a family member. If we did not discipline one because of who they were related to, but disciplined another for committing the same offense, this would be showing partiality. This is a sin (James 2:9).

    I have carefully considered this point. I fully realize that many may differ with this conclusion; however, we need Scriptures to establish a firm conclusion. The Scriptures are clear in demonstrating that God dealt firmly with his children in both the Old Testament as well as the New Testament. In the Old Testament, even a family member was dealt with firmly and decisively. In an effort to be objective, the following quote from "Withdraw Yourselves," by Dick Blackford (a Truth Tract) is offered for your consideration; however, it differs from my conclusion. Question 10: What if the withdrawee is a member of one's own household? Answer. "This is probably the only exception. One command does not cancel out another and withdrawal was not designed to destroy the family. However, the realm of the home is not merely a social thing. It is a divine and permanent relationship. We are not to stop fulfilling our roles and responsibilities to other family members (Ephesians 5:22,23 6:1-3). Even then, one should not act so as to condone or encourage the sinning child of God in any way." (pp. 7-8)

    I have known of different gospel preachers who are esteemed men of God who differ on this point. However, my conclusion remains because of overwhelming evidence from the word of God. The answer from the Old Testament examples are clear (Leviticus 20:11-12; Deutonomy 13:6-10; 21:18-24).

    For example, if parents had a child who was stubborn and rebellious, they had to bring him to the elders of the city and he would be stoned to death. This case is a parent and a child (Deut.21:18).

    Conclusion
    Is the subject of "Church Discipline" a positive one or a negative one? If you are a negative person, you may think it is one hundred percent negative. If you are a positive person, you may think there are some positive results of church discipline. I maintain that church discipline is a positive subject, with a positive effect on advancing the cause of Jesus Christ.

    Anytime an individual or congregation can: • Cause an erring brother to correct his wrong, Protect the hearts of the simple (Romans 16:18), • Provide actions where perhaps the spirit can be saved in the day of the Lord Jesus (1 Corinthians 5:5), • And warn the unruly (1 Thessalonians 5:14), this is positive.

    Just imagine with me the following scenario. A congregation refuses to enforce church discipline, and over the years experiences division, immorality, and heresy within the congregation. The environment would be poor, to say the least, and strong rebuke would be necessary; rebuke just as strong as that which Jesus gave to five of the seven churches of Asia (Revelation 2-3). They were told to repent or else—so let us do likewise!

    Who would want to be a member of a congregation with no discipline at all? "Preach what you want to preach." "Live like you want to live." "Do what you want to do, because this congregation does not enforce discipline."

    The purpose of discipline is to help the one in error to correct his wrongs. Paul said "so the spirit may be saved in the day of the Lord Jesus" (1 Corinthians 5:5). Again, Paul said "they he may be ashamed" (2 Thess. 3:14). The attitude in which discipline must be administered is described by Paul as "with unleavened bread of sincerity and truth" (1 Corinthians 5:8).

    Let it always be remembered that the one in error, who has been disciplined by the congregation can easily correct his spiritual life by "confessing his sins" (1 John 1:9). The infamous case of incest within the congregation at Corinth, in 1 Corinthians 5, was resolved with happy results, as we see in 2 Cor-inthians 1:5-11, where the one disciplined responded favorably and was restored.

    I see constructive things happening when discipline is enforced according to the New Testament. Let us never shirk our responsibility, but always press forward to defend the cause for which our Lord died, never showing respect of persons, nor partiality to anyone at anytime. The Lord be with you all!

    905 W. Grauwyler Rd., Irving, TX 75061

    Read more!

Sunday, March 29, 2015

Church Discipline

James D. Orten
PSN 2003


Over the fifty years that have been an adult member of the church, I have observed several instances of a brother being disfellowshipped from the body. The last one was just a few months ago As far as I can remember, in every case this extremely serious action by the church had a bad effect. The Christians disciplined did not repent, and in many cases it caused trouble in the congregations. With such results, I see no way to define these actions except as colossal failures.

In my judgment, the reason for such disappointing results was that the congregations had not prepared for church discipline before they got into the stress of actually doing it. Because they were guided by emotions rather than reason and Scripture, they were not effective with the subjects, and often did not obtain full support of the churches. Thus, I believe every congregation should study church discipline when no need for it is in view. That is precisely the time, perhaps the only time, the topic can be studied objectively, and a clear Biblical plan made for doing the task appropriately.
The Basis for Discipline
Church discipline is based on the principle that every Christian is a member of the body of Christ, the church. Each member must function in unity With the body so that the member may be nourished spiritually and the body may function properly. Clearly, this principle was intended to benefit individual members and the body.

Consider the human arm as an example. If it is were cut off from the body, it will deteriorate within several hours and can never be restored. But the body too will suffer; it can continue to live, but it can not function as well as it should without its arm.

That is exactly the principle Paul sets forth in I Corinthians 12:12-31. Other Scriptures teach the same principle. "Remember those. who rule over you, who have spoken the Word of God to you, whose faith follow, considering the outcome of their conduct" (Hebrews 13:7). The Word ''remember'' means keep in mind, especially considering the work they do and the responsibility they have.

Hebrews 13:17 restates this principle in stronger terms: ''Obey those who rule over you, and be submissive, for they watch out for your souls, as those who must give account, Let them do so with joy and not with grief, for that would not be profitable for you." In both verses the phrase ''those who rule over you" means "your leaders.'' Several translations say, ''Obey your leaders...'' In the ideal case, these leaders would be qualified elders and deacons. But the apostle did not say elders and deacons. He used a general term for leaders, probably suggesting the truth, that all churches have leaders. whether or not they have ordained elders. And the obligate for all Christians to work in unity with their leaders applies.

Consider Titus I 5: "For this reason I left you in Crete, that you should set in order the things that are lacking, and appoint elders in every city as I commanded you'' Most people believe Christianity was established in Crete by Jews who heard Peter preach on Pentecost and took the gospel with them when they returned home. Persons from that island are specifically mentioned among the nations represented in Acts 2:11. Ibis would suggest that some of those churches had existed for years, perhaps thirty years, before PauI wrote to Titus in AD. 65 or 66. Even though these churches did not have ordained elders, they did have leaders, because they had mem who were spiritually advanced enough to qualify as elders and be ordained by Titus.

Thus, all churches have leaders, and all Christians should work with their leaders under the direction of the Great Shepherd, Christ. And all churches should conduct Biblical discipline as needed and appropriate.

Purposes of Discipline
All acts of church discipline are done for two purposes that are of equal importance. Such phrases as "that the spirit may he saved" (1 Corinthians 5:5), ''restore such a one to fellowship in the body'' (Galatians 6:1)' and "that they may learn not to blaspheme'' (I Timothy 1:20), point to an emphasis on saving the erring brother. Even a brother who has been put out of the church is not to be simply forgotten. We are old not to "count him as an enemy, but admonish him as a brother" (2 Thessalonians. 3:15). This refers to continued efforts to reclaim him to repentance and salvation.

The second goal of church discipline is to protect and spiritually strengthen the church. Speaking of the incestuous fornicator and heretic at Corinth, Paul said "a little leaven leaveneth the whole lump" (1 Corinthians 5:6). Leaving that incestuous person in the church would weaken respect for the morality the Christian life demands. Putting such an unrepentant one out would confirm the church's faith in the morals it taught. Paul also suggested that this man's flagrant and open life would harm the reputation of the church. He said that such "sexual immorality is not even named among the Gentiles.''

The man's excommunication showed the world that he was living an aberrant lifestyle that was not approved by the body of Christ. We cannot correctly understand disfellowship, if we remove it from the broad context of church discipline. Yet, that is what we usually do. We often speak and behave as if disfellowship were the only form of discipline available to the church. If that were true, the church would be comparable to parents who for every infraction of their rules-large or small beat their child in the severest manner. That would perscription for destroying the child. In contrast to that, disfellowship is the terminal point in a continuum of discipline; it is the action of last resort.

A Continuum of Discipline
    1. Teaching and instruction. Just as all children need to learn in order to face life on their own, so all Christians must t grow spiritually to prepare to live with the Lord in eternity. The truths and principles of Christ are food for the soul. Instruction against sin is preventive discipline. Whenever we learn new truths and submit ourselves to them, we are accepting discipline. All Christians need such instructions throughout their lives. Such positive discipline compares to parents who give their children allowances to help them learn to manage money. It assumes good intentions on the part of the teacher and the taught. Every teacher contributes to church discipline and every listener receives it.

    2. Mild negative discipline. The word for this in the Scripture is "reproof." In 2 Timothy 4:2, Paul told Timothy to, "reprove, rebuke. exhort with all longsuffering and doctrine." The word "reprove" seems to combine the ideas of teaching and rebuke. Several translations give the word as "convince," others say ''correct." The writter suggests that the hearer is not accepting the teaching readily and needs somewhat more urging to do so. But the ideas of teaching and patience are still present. Note that Paul with all longsuffering and teaching.

    3. Rebuke is similar to reproof hut with a stronger tone. The Greek wordPaul used here however, Paul's charge for patience and instruction is still in effect. Just stopping wrong behaviors is never sufficient. We must teach the spiritual behaviors that should be put in their places.

    4. Sharp rebuke is a still stronger repremand. Paul recommcnded it to Titus 1:12-13: "One of them, a prophet of their own, said, 'Cretans arfe always liars, evil beasts, lazy gluttons. This testimony is true. Therefore rebuke them sharply, that they may be sound in the faith..." The Cretan society had apparently influenced Cretan Christians to live a riotous lifestyle. According to verse 10, "whole houses" have been subverted. As sin always does, their conscience had become hardened. Only severe rebuke would likely crack the shell of these stubborn hearts.

    5. Disfellowship is the final act of discipline for an offending Christian. In the early days of Christianity, this action acquired the descriptive title of excommunication, but it is spoken of Scripture by such terms as "withdraw yourselves from," (2 Thessalonians 3:6),''mark and avoid'' (Romans 16:17), and so on. After this action there is nothing more church leaders can do to reclaim a sinner, except to pray for him.

Discipline Directly from God
There is a more severe form of chastisement, but it is exercised directly by God. When there were divinely inspired prophets and apostles it was sometimes administered through them. Paul called this form of divine discipline "delivering to Satan," and spoke of it in 1 Corinthians 5:5 and 1 Timothy 1:20. The first case was that infamous fornicator in Corinth, and the second was two brothers, named Hymenaeus and Alexander, who sinned so that their conscience were defiled. Some Bible scholars believe the "destruction of the flesh" spoken of by Paul was literal, meaning the men would get sick and die, if they did not repent. We know that the man at Corinth did repent (2 Corinthians 2:14); we are not told of the results produced in Hymenaeus and Alexander.

There is remarkable agreement in good commentaries (i.e. Ellicott, MacKnight, Clark) on the two passages noted above. Here is a sample comment by Ellicott on 1 Timothy 1:20:"In this fearful formula the offender is delivered over to Satan, the evil one. It is a solemn excommunication or expulsion from the church, accompanied with infliction of bodily disease or death. In ordinary cases, the offender was quietly expelled from the Christian society. But an apostle, and only an apostle, seems to have possessed the awful powers of inflicting bodily suffering in the form of disease and death."

God's direct discipline was also administered by Peter on Ananias and Sapphira in Acts 5:1-11and by Paul on Elymas the sorcerer in Acts 13:8-12. It was aol minis I erctl on Moses iii [Exodus 4:24-26] because he had not circumcised his youngest son. In these and other cases in lie Old ']iestatnen t, the direct act tons of the Lord are clear. We can infer the reasons for c; (1(15 actions, and they Ft the ptirposts for discipline noted earlier, ibis form of discipline.,. with other sJ)ecia] Bowers of the Spirit, 'passed out of hitnuitt hands \viIli the death of the inspired apostles. [hat does riot mean that ( mci does not still adni.in ister it. 1~aLrl said. "hi the Lord loves lie chastetis...'' ([Tel). 12:6).When \V'C look at this contiiiuutn, we cat infer from it how God wants discipline adrntn stered. I Ic \va[1 ts church leaders to in form t lie unlearned, strengthen the weak, correct thi(. LIi1tHIV, and IiuiflI)1C the hard heart ed. lie clearly does not want a one -size - fits all approach in which a tender new convert is given the same discipline, as an arrogant heretic. Several passages lead to this conch sniii."And you, fathers, do not provoke ~'onr children to wrath, l)Ut bring them ~ in the training and admonition of the Lord'' (Lph. 6:41. There is a c.otiipatiion verse iii Colossiatis 3:21. MacKnight explains that verse as: '''"a thers, do 110 t exasperate your children by harsh commands, or by tel) tiking alit1 cli astising them more severe]y, and more frec1ueiitlv, than their faults deserve, lest they h)e discouraged."over e rs ave ea say strong disSeveral times tb yea I Ii Ii rd brethrencipline is what causes people to rej)en I.'' ['h at in av well be true of stubborn and arrogant pe tsons. But administered mdi scriniinately, I am certain it will hurt as many Chris Mans as it helps."N ow we exhort you, brethren, \va rn rho sc who are tin rtily, coin--fort the Fainthearted, uphold the weak, be patient with all'' (1 'I'hess. 5:14). One brother said that we behave as if this passage read, ''Warn the nut uly, warn the fainthearted, warn the weak, and be Men t with no one."And on sonic have c.ompa ssion, making a (us tine don; bitt others save with fear, pulling them out of the fire, hating even the garment defiled by the flesh" (jude 22-23). MacKnight gives versc 22 like this:''And making a tlistinction in s'onr methods of reclaiming sinners, have compassion indeed on SOme who hi ave erred through ignorance and weakness, and reclaim them by the gentle method of persuasion." 1-k a-~rtsrs stronger methods hit those whose behavior sho\~ a Corlie advises stronger methods for tl]Ose whose behavior shows a cotr up t heart.Ihe type of measured discipline we have been talking about was nor foreign to the Old Iestaineni . Ihere is a wonderful paralile iii Isaiah 28:23 28 tInt explains how God disciplined israel, and it was in the same way I us inspired writers taught it in the Nt.w lestament.taken together, these 5%ri;ittires teach that the effective disc~pIiiie God wants is discipline that is fitted to the condition of the sinner's heart and to the behavior lie. commits A uneittl -spirited, unruly person needs sharp rebuke, in contrast to a tenderhearted Lit misguided Kr son who needs gentle inst rue ho ii aiid support. Not all of this disct june can be done from the pu I pit. It seems a mlsc;i triage of justice to lash otit at ~III entire Cotigrega iou (or the 51115 of nile tIt a few persons. Just as most paren is W() ti hi si rink from disciplining their cliiidren in public, so the 1iiiIi~il is riot lit pllICe in carry cut! iflLLC.h (If the discipline needed in a church. l.ven lie process of excommunication is to start in private. (Nit. 18:1 ~What Sins Merit Church Discipline?The answer to the above question is "all tvpes." Christians should be taught that sins of every sort are against our new nature iii Christ and 5110111(1 lie pu t away (2 (~:c*rt: I 7). 'III e great j~rii1 ciples of spin tint] liv icig should be tatigh t 50 as to caLl SC' Lb ri s rians to shrink in Ii error from sin .As with children, an eniphasis (in positive training will o f'ten Olivia te tile neetl for h arsli discipline Ia te.r.Although the church di ro ugh its leaders executes formal discipline, all Christians can help in the training and growth of their I)rotbers and sisters. \X'b Cii & vi: r \VC see a fellow Christ ian sin, or one WIThI is not growing spiritually, we _liütild talk with him. Talking with others, however, obligates us to learn to do it appropriately'. One is not a good parent just because he spanks his child; he is a good parent only when lie effectively ins tills godly P rindpies. A church leader is not effective just because he gets au erring Christian ''I old;'' lie is effective when lie incites spiritual growth. :\Ithottgli all sins call Lot training and instruction, not all sins tflttiit e. xc ti in ni xi n t cat i on.What Sins Merit Disfellowship?We have great t]iffic7ulcv answering ~~ties lion. lbeic' has been genc nil agreetnen I cii 5* lIne sins, such as fornication (1 CurS: I 1), hut(1111cr Sills IlflhlW(i III 111(2 511flC passage ate ignored. I LOW many persons> A tid cj ties -have you known to I us di sfel Iowshipped for cove to ttstwss.tions arise even on those rim t seem cleat at first. For example, why did Pa tii order I lie church at Co rindh to pitt ottt the incestuous man iii 1 (Xi~t htaiis 5. and not tell them to take act ion against other foraY-caters who were in the same cli urch (see 2 Cot. 12:21) R I believe our difñcultv here is that we are asking the wrong question.'lb e ch nrc ii does clot dis fellowship sins, it dts fellowships (lb ris fan s who cc nini £1 sins. Ihe a pproptiate quest ton is, "What type oF erring Christ ian merit s disfellowship?'' Ihe answer is, a Christian Who) sttibliotiily :itid ()J)eIlIV cortitiue.s in sin, for which lesser forms of discipline have iiot worked. An application of this principle WI11 help one rind e ts t and Paul's seemingly inconsts tent act ions discussed in the preceding paragraph.Not all (lb ristians who commit the same sin liii act are the san~ y' ~w of sinne vs. (tie in ay l)e sinning out of ignorance, another maylie a new convert who has tin I ye.t grown, another may be under milder forms of church discipline, and on and on All Christians deserve an opportunity to repent. Christ gave Jezebel of Thyatira, a fornicator and Ii crc tic similar to the mati in I Corinthians 5, "time to repent" (Rev 2:21). We will have no person who is mote a disgrace to, or corrupter Y- the church than was she.A congregation might have to postpone excommunication of a brother because to do so at the Little WO cclii ii tin the cli tirch more than it would help It makes no sense to "p rotec.t the church" by a process that might destroy it. Doctors must constantly weigh the benefits of an opera tin with untoward consequences It may have, Ibis truth is taught in Jesus' Parable of the Tates and the Wheat in Matthew 13. Sta ted succinctly the principle there is: Save the wheat first. And it is the princip]e tlia t explains Pa LII'S decision ii ot to throw out at once all fornicators in ( Oriii th. lie said, I am ''prepared to punish all disobe dience, when your oI)edience is completed' (2 Cot. 10:6). N4acknight paraph vases Paul's slat etnent: 'tknd with respect to those who profess them selves Christians, I wej ate p re pa red by our miraculous po~ver to punish all disobedien Ce, as I shall do in Corinth, when the o l)edience of such of you as are disposed to repent is completed.''The Process of DisfellowshipmentI-low is excommLlnicatioii perfornied? 'l'he process of the final act of discipline is given in Matthew 18:15-17. It consists ofA first warning given in l)rivate. I'he reason for this seems obvious. A person approached in private 1))' SOmeone iie respects is more apt to listen. [f he repents, "you have gained your I)rother. if he does not repent within a reasonable period: A second warning is given in the pr ence of one or two witnesses. The person sent the Inst time, and those added as witnesses, should be individuals most likely to elicit repeti tance. If after another period for reflection the person still refuses to repent: The matter is takei i I )C U rc the cli urch Ibr final actic )n Note that in churches with fully tjttahifled elders and deacons, this action must lie (lotte I ~y a in iij (in I of i-Ii e I)ody. '1 he man in I Cohn thian s was delive red to Sa taui on I ~a ni's orders by a ''niajori iv'' of I he church (2 (br. 2:6). Apparently some in the church continued to support him, but the tnaponty followed Paul and the action was effective. ''This punishment which was inflicted - jority isby the masu fficiei ii for s ti(:l i a mn.'''I I r~ )ughout this process the cong rega lion s Ii o uld ni a ii tam an a tritude of mourning for the loss of the sinner's soul and for the hurt clone to the body of Christ. The appropriate attitude toward a brother who sins is sadness, not anger (Mt. 18:31, 1 Cor. 5:2, and 2 (br. 12:21). The reason for this response is that grief is an emotion that pulls people together (witness how people l)ehiave. at funerals), while anger repels them. Any disciplinary action taken in anger is almost certain to harden rather than soften the sinner.I am aware that sonic Christian's take the position that the process described here applies only to "personal sins" while "sins against the church" may be handled differently-. Usually rh e appeal is to 1 Corinthians 5 and the wish is to dispense a faster form of "justice." But the Scriptures do not substantiate such a conclusion. First, Paul said the man in I Corinthians 5 had sinned against a person. "[ did not wnte to \'otl for the sake of him who did the wrong, nor for the sake of him who suffered the wrong (2 Cot. 7:12). Second, no sin hurts only an individual. All sins are against God whose law has beeti broken. Most sins are against other persons; an(I all sins hurt the church to some cxtenk I or example, the. man who commits fornication sins against his own body (1 C or. 6:18), against God (2 Sani 12:13), against the partner with whom lie parlicipates in sin, against the spouse of his partner (2 Cot. 7:12), and against the church (1 (Yr. 5:1). Jhc brother against xviiotn a sin was commit ted is the logical one to shirt the process of discipline l)ecause he knows in os a I out it, I nit Jes us (in Klan licxv ] 8) was talking al)ou t Ii ow to handle sin in the church.Church leaders have the responsil)iIi I y of leat:niiig lo Use the full coil tinuum of procedures that promote spirilual growth. When that is clone, there will be few instances iii which a brother or sister will require the disctpline of last resort. Wlw,t iI is needed. and done in the appropriate attitude aim! the right way, it will likely leave dli' church stronger and proha 1)1>' reclaim the erring disciple.

9005 N 134/h it. Ave, Owasso. OK 74055

Read more!

Friday, August 15, 2008

Table of Contents

Preacher's Study Notes 1991

*** PLEASE NOTE: IF YOU SEE AN ARTICLE LISTED THAT IS NOT POSTED YET ---THAT YOU WOULD LIKE POSTED OR HAVE ANY COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT ME AND I WILL DO SO ASAP, Dennis at BibleTruths@hotmail.com ***

The Servant of the Lord and Strife (2 Tim. 2:24-26**), Brian Burns

The Chrisitian’s Relationship to the State, Terry Baze

The Importance of Genesis to Christianity, G. V. Avers

Church Organization in the Absence of Elders**, Alan Bonifav

Predestination (Ephesians 1:1-12), Murl Helwig

The Gift of the Holy Spirit (Acts 2:39), George Battey

Redemption, Wayne MeKamie

Congregational Maturity**, Jerry Harris

Importance of Predictive Prophecy to Apologetics, Jack Cutter

Realized Eschatology—The A.D. 70 Doctrine, Ronny Wade

Church Discipline, Allen Bailey

Romans and the NIV, Jerry Cutter

Preparation for the Mission Field, Greg DeGough

The Received Text, Johnny EIinore

Is Mark 16:9-20 an Interpolation?, Glen Osburn
Return to Main Menu ---Home

Read more!

Thursday, May 1, 2008

The Servant of the Lord and Strife

by Brian Burns

CE Preacher’s Study Notes 1991
Paul is not addressing any new problems here in this passage. Instead, he brings up one of the first instructions he ever gave to Timothy in his initial letter. Notice his words in I Timothy 1:3-6:“As I besought thee to abide still at Ephesus, when I went into Macedonia, that thou mightest charge some that they teach no other doctrine, neither give heed to fables and endless genealogies, which minister questions, rather than godly edifying which is in faith: so do. Now the end of the commandment is charity out of a pure heart, and of a good conscience, and of faith unfeigned: from which some having swerved have turned aside unto vain jangling."

Ephesus already had the reputation for false doctrines, fables, and empty meaningless talk. Barnes said, “The Greeks and the Hebrews were greatly given to controversies of various kinds; and many of the questions discussed pertained to points which could not be settled, or which, if settled, were of no importance.” There were, and still are, much more important matters to deal with than these that lead to more problems. Paul was so determined to get this point across that he also wrote it in I Timothy 1:4; 4:7; 2 Timothy 2:16, 23; and Titus 3:9.

Destructive questions were prominent then, as well as now, and needed to be properly handled, as they do now. As with any type of evil, the course to take is plain according to Paul. In this chapter he says one should “shun, purge, flee, and refuse.” But, this is not all there is to combating evil. The Holy Spirit inspired positive instruction to follow the prohibitions. Let’s look at what Timothy was to avoid and what he should employ.

Definitions
    1. “foolish” (Greek, moros, Strong’s #3473): “impious, godless” (Thayer, p. 420).
    2.unlearned” (apaidutos) (#521): “(only here in the N.T.) “without instruction and discipline, uneducated, ignorant, rude” (Thayer, p. 525) (All sources seem to agree).
    3.questions” (zeeteesis) (#2214): “(controversial) question, issue” (Arndt & Gingrich). “a subject of questioning or debate, matter of controversy" (Thayer, p.272).
    4.avoid” (paraiteomai): “to refuse, decline, avoid” (Vine’s, p. ?)
    5.knowing” (ido): “The tenses coming from ido and retained by usage form two families, of which one signifies ‘to see,’ the other ‘to know."
    6.gender” (gennao): “lit, become the father of 3. fig. bring forth, produce, cause” (Amdt & Gingrich, p. 155) [as in our text—BB].
    7. strifes” (makee): “in our lit. only in the plural and only of battles fought without actual weapons --- fightings, quarrels, strifes, disputes” (Amdt & Gingrich, p. 496).
    8.servant” (doulos): “an adj., ‘signifying in bondage,’ is used as a noun, arid the most common and general for ‘servant’, frequently indicating subjection without the idea of bondage” (Vine’s).
    9.must” (dei): “moral obligation” (Vincent).
    10.strive (makomai) (#3164): “to quarrel, rangle, dispute” (Thayer, p. 394).
    11.gentle” (eepios): “affable, mild, gentle” (Wuest).
    12.apt to teach” (didaktikos): “skilled in teaching” (Vine’s).
    13.patient” (anexikakos): “putting up with evil. Here only in the N.T.” (Robertson).
    14.meekness” (praotees): “gentleness, humility, courtesy, consideration” (Arndt & Gingrich, p. 699).
    15.instructing” (paiduo): “to train children, to teach” (Vine’s).
    16.oppose themselves” (antidiatithemenos): “signifies to place oneself in opposition, oppose (anti, against, dia, through [intensive), tithemi, to place) (Vine’s).
    17.preadveure” will give (mepote): is used wan various meanings according to the context” (Vine’s).
    18.repentance” (metanoya or -noia) (#3341): “a change of mind” (Thayer, p. 405).
    19.acknowledging” (epignosis): “more correctly, ‘the’ knowledge” (Vincent).
    20.recover” (ananeepho) (#366): “to return to soberness” (Thayer, p. 40).
    21.snare” (pagis) (#3803): “whatever brings peril, loss, destruction” (Thayer, p. 472).
    22.who are taken captive” (zogreo): “signifies to take men alive” (Vine’s).
    23. by him” (autou) and “his (ekeinou) will” (see discussion).
Discussion
Paul’s statement here seems to make it plain that such questions will definitely arise. Some believe that Timothy may have been trying to satisfy every inquisitor that came his way and that he needed to learn how to avoid these circumstances. Matthew Henry said,

It is very remarkable how often, and with what seriousness, the apostle cautions Timothy against disputes in religion, which surely was not without such design as this, to show us that religion consists more in believing and practicing what God requires than in subtle disputes.”

So, there are times that we refuse certain types of questions. Earnest R. Campbell, Greek student and instructor, said,
The word ‘questions’ basically speaks of seeking, inquiries, and looking for something. It is used pertaining to questions and disputes about cleansing (John 3:25), about circumcision (Acts 15:2, 7), and with respect to that which is contrary to sound words (1 Timothy 6:3, 4). In actual usage it seems to speak of questions which border on becoming disputes.”

This is the same word used in 1 Timothy 1:4 that is the product of “fables and endless genealogies,” and what is “unprofitable and vain” (Titus 3:9). When the end results are obvious, we are not bound by 1 Peter 3:15 to answer; instead, we reject it. Paul reminds Timothy that he already knows this. This word is often rendered see Whether it is translated “see” or “knowing,” the experience always seems to be an absolute. Some examples:
    Matthew 2:2we have ‘seen’ his star
    Mark 5:6 “when he ‘saw’ Jesus”
    Luke 12:30 “Father ‘knoweth’ that ye have need
    Luke 19:41he ‘beheld’ the city
The use of “knowing” indicates that Timothy knew, on the basis of past experience, that such questions do breed fights. Lenski said, “Having gotten to know that point of ‘knowing’ this; he is no longer uneducated even on this point.” It is interesting to note that such questions gender or “become the father” of strifes, plural. Vine and Arndt & Gingrich point out that this word is always in the plural. In other words, many fights may be the offspring of just one godless and uneducated question that is argued instead of rejected.

These fights and quarrels are not consistent with the conduct of the Lord’s servant. Paul puts the servant under moral obligation to comply with the following instructions. “Must” is used in the same way here as it is in I Timothy 3:2. There it requires an elder to have all of the stated qualities, and here it requires the servant to meet these. Thayer calls this servant “one who gives himself up wholly to another’s will.” This describes every true Christian, not just the preacher or teacher. The first obligation given to the servant is a negative. “Do not fight, quarrel or dispute” (Vine’s, p. 83). Wuest shows the Greek to be machomai, the word from which we get the word “macho.” This is not the same word that is used in the following verses.
    2 Timothy 2:5 — ”strive lawfully”, atheo, from athos, meaning “a contest, to engage in a contest.”
    Luke 13:24 — ”Strive to enter in at the strait gate”, agonizomai, “to endeavor with strenuous zeal” (Thayer, p. 10).
    Romans 15:30 —”strive together with me in your prayers sunagonizomai, “to help one” (Thayer, p. 600).
    Jude 3 —“earnestly contend for the faith”, epagonizomai, similar to above.
To the faithful men of 2 Timothy 2:14, Timothy was to “charge them before the Lord that they strive not about words to no profit.” “Strive” here is logomakeo meaning “to wrangle about empty and trifling matters.”

In summary, inspiration does not allow the servant to be quarrelsome at all. This is not limited to the questions of verse 23. This command should be coupled with the instructions of James 1:19-20. Gentleness should take the place of fights. Vine tells us that the Greeks applied this word to a nurse with trying children, a teacher with refractory scholars, or of parents toward their children. This is the very way Paul used the word in I Thessalonians 2:7But we were gentle among you, even as a nurse cherisheth her children.” This gentleness is not allowing others to walk all over us, but it is the outlook of a person seeking the good of others even if they are obstinate.

In order to fulfill this gentleness, the servant must be qualified to teach. This word is didaktikos, from which we get the English word “didactic,” meaning “used or intended for teaching.” Context would also demand the desire to teach as well as the ability. A nurse, teacher, or parent lacking the desire to assist others would perform poorly. Matthew Henry ties this in with the preceding items by saying, “Those are unapt to teach who are apt to strive, and are fierce and froward.” The only other time this word is used it is required of the elder, but here to the servant of the Lord “which might not always be an evangelist” (E. M. Zerr). If you work with people very long the need for patience will be evident. This is the only time this word is used in the New Testament Vine shows this to be a compound word from anecho, “to hold up”, and kakos, meaning “evil.” E. R. Campbell believes this to be very close to anekomai, which involves holding up another that is weak, or in trouble, as in Ephesians 4:2 and Philippians 3:13, where it is rendered “forbearing.” With this characteristic we are able to work out the evil without resentment toward the person. Not a compromise or acceptance of evil, but working it out with the qualities listed above. All of these accomplishments are achieved through meekness. Vine elaborates by saying,

It must be clearly understood, therefore, that the meekness manifested by the Lord and commended to the believers is the fruit of power. The common assumption is that when a man is meek it is because he can not help himself; but the Lord was “meek” because He had the infinite resources of God at His command. Described negatively, meekness is the opposite to self- assertiveness and self-interest.

This same attitude is needed when we try to restore an erring brother (Galatians 6:1), and Paul says meekness is a fruit of the Spirit (Galatians 5:22-23). “Meek” does not mean “weak”, but is “strength under control.” To the casual reader these words may seem to be soft and feeble but these methods are used in “instruction.” Instruction is a stronger word than “teach” in verse 24, because it includes correction and discipline. Thayer uses the word “castigate,” which means “to punish or rebuke sharply, esp. by harsh public criticism” (Webster’s). The Lord “chastens” those that He loves (Hebrews. 12:6-7; Revelations 3:19). Paul wrote of Hymeneus and Alexander that he delivered to Satan “that they learn not to blaspheme.” This instruction cannot be misunderstood as condoning the practice of those in opposition. They have set themselves against what is good and right. Although they are “opposing” what is good for them, this word mainly means that they oppose God, as the men did that blasphemed in I Timothy 1:20.

We now learn that repentance is the goal of all of this work. Is repentance a decision of the individual or of God? This part of the verse says, “if God peradventure will give them repentance.” Peter tells us that the Lord is “not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance” (2 Peter 3:9). Now we know the answer, but what does this phrase mean? This phrase is a 2 aorist active optative which expresses a desire and denotes action, but does not indicate if it is completed.

The Calvinists find their doctrine of the elect in this verse, but it is not taught here. As Lenski said, “the thought is not that God ever withholds repentance, but that men so often refuse to accept it.” The choice is up to the one in opposition that is being instructed by the Lord’s servant in the way of truth. Paul told the Ephesians that he wanted God to give them (same as “give” above) “the spirit of wisdom and revelation in the knowledge of Him” (Ephesians. 1:17). This too was a wish and not something that God would do to them without any action on their part. In Chapter 3:1-4, they found out that they needed to read his letters and then they would gain wisdom and knowledge from the revelation of God. Another example is found in Acts 5:31. The apostles are explaining to the Jews about Jesus and his mission here on Earth. “Him hath God exalted with his right hand to be a Prince and a savior, for to give repentance to Israel, and forgiveness of sins.” We know that this giving of repentance and forgiveness was not unconditional, but was contingent upon their belief and obedience to the words Peter spoke to them that day in Acts 2:36-41. Repentance is brought about by an “acknowledging” of the truth which means a “correct knowledge” (Thayer). The acknowledging is not a proclamation of the truth, but gaining a full knowledge which enables one to understand where they are and what they need to do. With this insight to the truth the individual repents. To repent is “to change one’s mind or purpose and it always involves a change for the better in the N.T.” (Vine). Knowledge of truth and repentance leads one to “recover” themselves or “to return to soberness” (Thayer). There is a picture here of a Christian, intoxicated with error, and suddenly the truth shows him where he is, and he makes a change for the better. Arndt and Gingrich say it means to “come to one’s senses again.” Although it is a different phrase, this does remind us of the prodigal when he “came to himself” (Luke 15:17). A person brought to his senses would never want to remain in the snare of the devil. It is a sad predicament to be captured by Satan, but even worse not to know it. The Laodiceans did not even know how pitiful they really were, but Jesus enlightened them so they would have the occasion to repent and open the door of their heart to Him (Revelations 3:14-19).

Snares capture alive but continue to tighten so that they always maim and eventually kill. Many animals are drawn to a snare because it appears to be an easy passage or doorway, but they learn too late that it is a deadly trap. Satan makes the allurements of evil attractive and easy, thus capturing many that think they can pass by unharmed. But this verse deals mainly with the escape not the capture. The individual spoken of here has been patiently taught, nursed, and instructed in the truth, so that they may repent and sober up, but then they are taken captive again. The word “captive” always means “taken alive or held captive.” Luke 5:10 is the only other time it is used, and the Lord is telling the disciples that “henceforth thou shalt catch men.”

The last phrase of this verse, “by him at his will,” has given rise to much discussion. If Paul had stopped at this point, much ink would have been saved, but he added the perfect participle and two pronouns autou (“him”), ekeinou (“his”), and this divides the commentators into three groups:
    1. Caught by the devil to do the devil’s will.
    2. Caught alive by God to do His will.
    3. Captured alive by the devil—then the last phrase—”for God’s will” is then thought to modify the whole clause—”sobered up again for God’s will” (Lenski).
There are notable and accepted works that are divided on this last part of the verse. Most translations checked seem to agree with the first view. Bullinger takes number two and Robertson says of the third view, “This is probably the best, ‘taken captive by the devil’ ‘that they may come back to soberness to do the will of God. There are difficulties in either view.”

Since we usually want to settle on one, the second view seems to be the most logical. Jesus told his followers long ago that they were to capture men, using the Gospel of course. Here the servant of the Lord is trying to lead the trapped individual out of the devil’s snare and into the safety of God’s will. Having been created beings and not creators, we arc destined to be under someone or something’s control. Paul shows us the two choices in Romans 6:16 — “Know ye not, that to whom ye yield yourselves servants to obey, his servants ye are to whom ye obey; whether of sin unto death, or of obedience unto righteousness?” So the choice is still the person’s. We can have sin or righteousness, repent or reject the truth, sober up or stay in intoxication, be a captive of God to do His will or stay in the snare of the devil. This whole passage is a progression, so it seems best that it ends with God as the total victor. E. M. Zerr says that “the captive is freed and taken captive by the Lord and put to service that is in harmony with His will.” Lenski explains,

The devil’s snare does not catch alive, it always implies spiritual death; or, if you will, when his net closes, the devil hits his victim on the head. God catches alive so that his catch remains alive. One should not disregard this perfect participle: a recent past being caught alive and so remaining caught and alive. Is that not what the gospel does? So we see why ‘autou’(him), which refers to God, occurs in the last phrase and is properly followed by ‘ekeinou’(his) and not merely by another ‘autou’. This last pronoun is very emphatic because it repeats the first: ‘caught alive by him (who alone ever so catches and holds men) for that One’s will (who alone so catches).’ Yes, ‘if perhaps,’ such a result is achieved; out of the devils snare (negative) and caught alive to remain so by God and for His will, it would be a blessed result. MacKnight also takes this position.

Summary
Being written for the Lord’s servant makes this passage as applicable today as the day that Paul held his own pen. There are disputes that can and must be avoided so that precious time is used to spread the Gospel and not giving birth to strifes. There were times that Jesus refused to answer certain questions. We too need to learn how to evaluate the ones that come our way. The Lord’s servant is morally bound not to strive. Ensnared Christians need to be approached with these attributes and abilities so that they may be able to make the correct choice and escape the devil’s snare. They then return to being productive servants of God, performing His will with the rest of the servants.

402 Blanco St., Duncanville, TX 75137

Read more!

Church Organization
in the Absence of Elders

by Alan Bonifay
Christian Expositor’s 1991 Preacher Study Notes

We have reached a point of crisis in our churches. One of the identifying marks of a New Testament church was its system of governance. The Bible’s teaching is clear --- God intends for congregations of Christians to be governed by duly qualified, specially selected, and officially ordained bishops. Yet, by and large, we do not have the mature congregations such an arrangement stipulates. The vast, overwhelming majority of our assemblies do not have elders, and most are not likely to have them in the foreseeable future. Furthermore, a high percentage of the few congregations who do have overseers are experiencing grave difficulties in maintaining New Testament organization. Consequently, we are hindered in our labors for the Master’s cause as decision-making degenerates into an arduous, unhappy, and ineffective enterprise. Leadership, direction, guidance, and training are skills which are profoundly lacking among us.

Decision-making among us most often derives from one of three unscriptural mechanisms. A few of our congregations operate on what Alexander Campbell called an American system of “wild democracy” (Millennial Harbinger, 1835; p. 493). Decisions are made on the basis of majority rule. In some cases, even the necessary margin of majority has been legislated. Such a system has absolutely no biblical basis upon which to rest, and its fundamental principle of rule is rooted in pragmatism, which teaches that whatever the most say is best. Nothing could be farther from the truth of God’s Word.

However, most of our brethren realize that such an approach is wholly without biblical authority, and these usually opt for a consensus method. If anything, this is worse than the democratic method, because it not only lacks biblical support, it is also woefully ineffective, since virtual unanimity must prevail before anything can be done. As a result, what becomes everybody’s business ends up being nobody’s business.

Still a third method is employed more often than we like to admit. It is rule by one man who often represents the largest family of the congregation. The principle driving this leadership style is that control lies in the hand of whoever gets the maddest, the loudest, the longest. Needless to say, this alternative is not scriptural either.

In view of this state of affairs we need to begin again. We must discover a biblical system of church government which will sustain our congregations, and enable them to function effectively and peaceably during the interim when they are developing men to receive the eldership. This system should be a temporary one which actively encourages the development of shepherds for the flock. “God is not the author of confusion” (1 Corinthians 14:33), and confusion prevails now. Therefore, we must search the Scriptures for a Bible plan.

In beginning, we once more remind ourselves that ultimately all authority in heaven and earth rests in the hands of the Lord Jesus Christ, and is expressed to us in the written Word of God. In all of our activity the Word of God must be exalted to the position of absolute preeminence. The New Testament reveals to us the entirety of God’s will for us. Therefore, any plan of church government must be authorized by God’s Word. Furthermore, any member of the body of Christ who can teach us the truth of God’s Word must be given an opportunity to do so within the confines of biblical limitations. The supreme authority for all our action must ever be the teachings of the gospel.

As I mentioned, “God is not the author of confusion” (1 Corinthians 14:33). He is a God of order and precision, and has given us a detailed plan for the government of mature churches. Is it consistent with God’s character that He has left immature congregations deprived of any plan for governance? Has God left churches who do not have men qualified to be elders under the authority of mob rule? We believe that He has not done any such thing. In His Word, God has given us a plan whereby congregations are to be governed by the teachers until leaders can be developed who qualify to be elders.

Many, if not most, of our churches have corrupted this plan. We have allowed the principle of democratic government, with its emphasis on the rights of the individual, to hold sway in our congregations. Chiefly, we have derailed God’s plan for teachers in two areas.

First, in our drive to encourage mutual edification, we have created a monster by insisting that virtually every male member who can be cajoled into doing so must become a teacher. However, in all too many cases we have provided no more training than to say, “Here is a Bible, and here’s Zerr’s commentary. You take the chapter next Wednesday.” Or what is even worse, “Here is a sermon outline book. Work something up for the third Sunday night.” Not surprisingly, we have many teachers who have difficulty edifying the body.

Second, we have compounded the problem by equalizing every male member and expecting them all to participate in the final decision-making process of the congregation. Don’t misunderstand! Good leaders consider the thoughts and views of all the membership. Even elders should stay in close touch with the desires of everyone in the congregation. There is no question that every brother and sister should have some method of input. However, when all of that has been considered, teachers, operating under the authority of God’s word, should be the leaders and decision-makers in a congregation which has not yet attained elders.

The Scriptures teach that in the absence of men qualified to be elders, a congregation’s teachers should be its leaders. In the demonstration of this concept we shall consider several New Testament congregations which had rulers who are not designated as elders in the record. We shall then inquire whom these rulers may be. Discovering that they were unmistakably the teachers, we shall endeavor to delineate the distinction between teachers and speakers that must prevail. Finally, we shall offer a few suggestions concerning the implementation of this Bible plan.

Congregations of the New Testament Who Had
Rulers Who are Not Called Elders
1 Thessalonians 5:12-28
In verse 12 we note that the congregation was exhorted to recognize the authority of those men who were over them in the Lord --- that is, those who were their admonishers. In verse 13, these leaders were to be respected highly for their work’s sake and the congregation was to be governed by peace. These verses describe the congregation’s relationship to its leaders.

Then in verse 14, in what Conybeare and Howson call a postscript, Paul addresses those who are the admonishers. As Chrysostom noted, those who are directed to admonish are the same who are described immediately before (v. 12) as giving admonition (p. 310).

In verses 14b-28, Paul details the responsibilities of the rulers to the congregation, and in verse 27 he charges the leaders to have this epistle read to all the holy brethren.

But who are these leaders? It is often assumed that they were presbyters, but that is purely an assumption. The record does not refer to them as elders at all. In fact, due to the chronology of events, it seems evident that they were not elders.

According to Conybeare and Howson, I Thessalonians “was written not long after the conversion of the Thessalonians (1:8-9), while the tidings of it were still spreading through Macedonia and Achaia and while Paul could speak of himself as only taken from them for a short season (2:17). St. Paul had been recently at Athens (3:1), and had already preached in Achaia (1:7-8). Timotheus and Silas were just returned from Macedonia (3:6) which happened soon after St. Paul’s first arrival at Corinth (Acts 18:5)” (p. 304). In their chronological table they date both Paul’s first visit to Thessalonica when he established the church and his first epistle to them as occurring in the same year --- 52 A.D.” (p. 833).

Peloubet’s Dictionary of the Bible states first that Paul wrote I Thessalonians “a few months” after leaving Thessalonica, and then later narrows this time factor to “probably within three or four months” (p. 686,687).

A. T. Robertson’s “New Testament Chronology” deviates from these dates by about one year, dating Paul’s initial visit in 50 A.D. and his epistle in 50 or 51 A.D. However, Robertson does recognize the short span of time between the two events (The Master Bible, p.143).

The point to be registered is that conservative scholarship widely attests that this letter was written only a few months after the church at Thessalonica was established. Accordingly, it is not surprising that we encounter no mention of the presence of elders in this congregation. It seems evident, even by New Testament standards, that the time between the church’s inception and the writing of Paul’s missive was too short for the congregation to have had men qualified and ordained as elders. In addition, we should recognize the predominantly Gentile nature of this congregation: these were not “Gentiles of the gate,” for they had turned from idols to serve the true and living God (1 Thessalonians 1:9). The likelihood of there being men among former idolaters who had attained the moral height expected of presbyters was remote. Nevertheless, the congregation did have recognized leaders --- the congregation knew them and Paul knew them, but they are nowhere designated as elders.

Finally, it is well to note that I Thessalonians 3:1-3 reveals that during this time when a congregation is being ruled by leaders who are not elders they may find it advantageous to work with an evangelist from time to time.

1 Corinthians 16:15-16
Nowhere can bishops be found at Corinth. As far as the record is concerned, the congregation had no elders, yet they were instructed to submit to Stephanus and to men like him. The word “submit” (hupotassesthe), means “to place under; to subordinate.., to submit one’s self, render obedience, be submissive (Luke 2:51; 10:17; Romans 10:3; 13:1),” (Bagster, p. 418).

If the congregation was instructed to submit to Stephanus and men like him, then Stephanus and men like him who had addicted themselves to the ministry were to be regarded as the congregation’s rulers or leaders. Notice that the men under consideration were men set for or devoted to the ministry. In verse 18, the church was to acknowledge men like Stephanus, Fortunatus and Achaicus. That is, they were to recognize and show respect to such men.

Hebrews 13:7, 17, 24
It has been generally assumed that the word “rulers” in these verses was a reference to presbyters, but such a view cannot be sustained by the Word of God. There is no question that elders are rulers in the congregation, nor that they are included here in this passage. But the point is that the reference is broader than an exclusive reference to elders. The word means “to lead the way, to be chief, to preside, to govern, to rule” (Bagster, p. 184). it is translated “a guide, a leader, a chieftain, a prince, and a Roman provincial governor” (Bagster, p. 184). In many English translations it is given as “leaders.” In Luke 22:26, it is used by Jesus to show that church leaders are to be recognized by their servitude.

In verse 7, where Paul instructs the brethren to “remember their leaders,” his reference is to the example of Christianity set by those who have been martyred for the faith. No doubt he has in mind Stephen, a servant of tables and the church’s first great debater; and James, the brother of John and an apostle of Jesus Christ, as well as others who were swept away in the fires of persecution. He particularly stresses their teaching of God’s Word and their faithful example.

Obviously the meaning of the word “rulers” in these verses is broader than a reference to elders. The church at Jerusalem had apostles (Acts 11:1;15:6); elders (Acts 11:30); prophets (Acts 11:27); evangelists (Acts 6:5; 8:5; 21:8); teachers (Acts 5:42, et. al.); and leading men (Acts 15:22).

By the time the book of Hebrews was written, the church in Jerusalem was in danger of a mass apostasy, and they were commanded to call to remembrance their former great leaders who had spoken to them the Word of God, and who had set the example of faithful endurance to the end. A congregation’s leaders are those who instruct the congregation in the Word of God and set the example of faithful, diligent service.

In verse 17, the apostle counsels the believers to submit to their leaders and to obey them. He further admonishes leaders concerning their grave responsibilities --- they are to watch for the souls of their brethren and give account to the Lord for their leadership.

Finally, in verse 24, Paul tells the Hebrews “metaphorically to welcome to their heart or understanding” their leaders (Bagster, p. 56). Here there are two points to be gained:
    (1) the congregation is to remember, to obey, to submit, and to mentally embrace its leaders; and
    (2) the leaders are to speak to the people the Word of God, to set the example of faithful Christian service, and to watch for the souls of the brethren as men who must account for their leadership to the Lord.
These leaders may be elders, evangelists, or teachers, depending on the circumstances of the congregation.

Having now established that there were congregations in the New Testament who had rulers who were not designated as elders, let us now see whom these rulers might be in our non-miraculous age. Specifically, let us consider the office of the teacher.

It is true that in New Testament times, evangelists were leaders of congregations that did not have presbyters, and they are leaders of similar congregations today --- particularly of those they have planted. However, we have many congregations which were not established by an evangelist, or if they were, they are no longer working closely with him. It was no different in New Testament days.

The dispersion in Acts 8:1-4 is evidence of this type of situation. Thousands of Christians went everywhere preaching the Word and establishing congregations (Acts 11:19-26). Such congregations are to work under the leadership of their teachers until such time as they have attained the maturity to have bishops directing them.

The New Testament recognizes the office of the teacher, and this fact is one that has been minimized, and at times, entirely overlooked among churches today. The office of the teacher is one of legitimacy and importance. It is the forgotten office of leadership.

The Forgotten Office of Leadership:
The Teacher
Romans 12:7
This passage lists teaching as one of the gifts given to the church. The word used for gifts in verse 6 designates spiritual gifts. During the age of revelation, men were given gifts which enabled them to teach by inspiration the Word of God and to exhort men to obey it. Alexander Campbell said, in the Millennial Harbinger, October 1835:

A teacher and an exhorter may sometimes be found in the same person; but they are not the same office, nor the same work. The establishment and the development of truth is the work of the teacher ... a teacher ascertains and develops truth, and supports it by arguments... It would greatly enhance the value of their public services if they would always have some point or points in view when they arise to speak.

1 Corinthians 12:28
In his discussion of spiritual gifts, Paul declares that God “set” some in the church to be teachers. The word “set” is etheto, which means “to set, fix, establish, to make, appoint, to make, set or appoint for oneself” (Abbot-Smith, p. 445). It is used in several interesting passages. For example, in Acts 20:28, “...the Holy Spirit has made you overseers ...”; in 1 Timothy 1:12, “And I thank Christ Jesus our Lord who has enabled me, because He counted me faithful, putting me into the ministry”; in I Timothy 2:7, “for which I was appointed a preacher and an apostle — I am speaking the truth in Christ and not lying — a teacher of the Gentiles in faith and truth”; and in 2 Timothy 1:11, “to which I was appointed a preacher, an apostle, and a teacher of the Gentiles.” [emphasis mine—AWB].

It seems to be in accord with the usage of this word “set,” that the congregation which does not have men who qualify to be elders should appoint men who are qualified to be teachers to be their leaders.

Ephesians 4:11-13
Spiritual gifts were given to these men to enable them to fill these offices during the age of revelation. Verse 13 states the limitation of the miraculous powers --- “until we come to the unity of the faith.” Miraculous gifts were given to these men so that they could equip the saints to do the work of the ministry and edify the body until the revelation was completed.

However, after the completion of the record, the saints still need to be equipped for the work of the ministry and the edification of the body. The roles of apostles and prophets have ceased because they are by nature miraculous ministries; but evangelists, pastors, and teachers continue to equip the saints, by using the completed revelation as their basis for instruction.

Five offices are described here. As Beet notes, “The pastors and teachers are grammatically closely joined as describing either the same office or offices closely allied” (J. Agar Beet, Commentary on Ephesians, Philippians, Colossians, Phulemon, p. 337). In view of the fact that in both Romans 12 and I Corinthians 12, the rulers or governors are separated from the teachers, it is apparent that these last two offices share the same article because their work is so closely aligned. In other words, it seems evident that the elders and teachers here share the same article because both work so closely together in the local congregation. Godet says, “In the enumeration, Ephesians 4:11, the teacher is at once associated with and distinguished from the pastor” (Godet, Commentary on the Epistle to the Romans, p. 432).

The following two passages clearly indicate that there was the office of the teacher in the New Testament church:
    Acts 13:1-3
    In this passage the church at Antioch is reckoned to have prophets and teachers. No elders are mentioned here, yet the congregation had a scriptural system of government. Evidently, these men were gathered in session together either discussing or doing the work of ministering. They were doing the work of leadership. The teachers and prophets ordained Barnabus and Saul and sent them out. Teachers are accredited a position of equality in authority with the prophets in this matter. This passage illustrates all that we have been teaching to this point.

    2 Timothy 2:2
    This passage clearly carries the work of the teacher beyond the age of miracles. Paul writes to Timothy who is laboring with the elders at Ephesus and assigns Timothy, the evangelist, the duty of training teachers so that the work of instructing the body can be carried on by the next generation of leaders. The word “commit” is pairathou, and means “to inculcate, to deposit, commit to the charge of, entrust, to command” (Bagster, p. 306).

    The office of the teacher was to be continued throughout the Christian age. But who are the men who should fill this office today? Is every speaker in the congregation a teacher? How should the brethren choose their teachers? These are vital, pressing questions that must be answered so we can begin to correctly implement God’s will for our congregations. The Scriptures clearly delineate who is a teacher.
Who is the Teacher?

2 Timothy 2:2; Romans 12:7
A teacher is a man who has demonstrated by his life that he is a faithful, dependable, trustworthy man. Furthermore, he is a man who is capable of instructing others in the doctrine of God’s Word. Not all who understand the doctrine are capable of teaching it to others, and not all who are capable of teaching it to others are dependable and trustworthy men. Both qualities are essential in the life of a teacher.

Ephesians 4:12
The aim of evangelists, pastors, and teachers must be the full development of the church. They are to equip the church for the work and battle of the Christian life. The first preposition translated “for” is pros; the other two are eis. As Beet notes, they are used for the further and nearer objects in view (p. 338). In other words, the officers are to equip the saints (which is the nearer object in view) so that the saints can do the work of the ministry and edify the body (which is the further object in view). “God designs that, through the agency of the officers of the Church and through the consequent progress of the Church as a whole, each individual Christian, standing as he does in special relation to God, may attain his full development,” (Beet, p. 338). Where there are no evangelists and pastors then, this work of equipping the saints falls into the capable hands of teachers.

Hebrews 5:12-14
Teachers are thoroughly conversant with the fundamental truths of the gospel. They are men who have grown beyond the dependence immature or newborn Christians have upon basic simple teachings. These fundamental doctrines have become so ingrained they are automatic. Teachers are men who desire the strong meat or difficult teachings of God’s word, who have become skillful or experienced in the word of righteousness. They are sound in doctrine — mature Christians, not newborn babes nor slow-learning children. They are of full age, and their senses have become well-trained by constant practice in distinguishing good from evil. These men can read and understand the Word. They can examine the trends of the world and rightly apply the knowledge they have learned. In summary, they are wise men.

The word rendered “having been exercised” is from gegumnasmena. It is used for the training an athlete undergoes, and is suggestive of the tremendous self-discipline an athlete must exhibit in order to develop his muscles. Just as the athlete practices in order to develop his skill, the teacher is an avid spiritual exerciser. He is not dull or sluggish. His training is by habit rigorous.

All of these are the characteristics of mature men properly exercising the office of the teacher.
    James 3:1
    The work of the teacher is not for every one.
    We have many good speakers who are not mature enough to be teachers; we need them and they should be encouraged to continue in their development, but they are not teachers. Teachers are mature Christians who are willing to shoulder a grave responsibility --- training the brethren in the Word of God. This passage (James 3:2-12) is usually interpreted to speak against backbiting, talebearing, whispering, and the like, and by legitimate extension it does. However, the direct application must not be missed. Specifically, the object of the passage is the teacher and the grave responsibility that he assumes when he accepts that office. The writer’s point is that it is through the power of the spoken word that men’s lives can be turned around (3:2-5), and it is the duty of the teacher to do it correctly. It is very easy for the simple and unsuspecting to be led astray by persuasive but incorrect purveyors of God’s Word.

    Manifestly, the office of the teacher involves far more than making a talk once a month. God’s teacher should be guided by the principle of the watchman on the wall which God gave to Ezekiel. The watchman’s obligation was to sound the warning promptly and accurately. In so doing he delivered himself from the blood of his hearers. This is precisely the principle to which Paul referred when he told the elders at Ephesus that he was “pure from the blood of all men. For I have not shunned to declare unto you all the counsel of God” (Acts 20:26-27).
How Shall Congregations
Implement This Plan?
Perhaps you are thinking, “How can I go back to my home church and put this system into action?” Implementation of this scriptural plan should be slow but sure. It will not be easy. It will take time. We are not advocating the ouster of current leaders and speakers — instead, let us begin by teaching and training the members the truth on this matter. Give people time to think about it and opportunity to study and question the parts they find unclear. If you are a teacher, begin to do the work of a teacher if you are not already doing it. Begin to train men to teach others.

When the time is propitious, allow the congregation to choose and appoint its teachers. Remember, the New Testament church often set apart men for special works with fasting, laying on of hands, and prayer. Examples are found in Acts 6 (the seven who waited on tables); Acts 15 (Judas and Silas); 2 Corinthians 8 (the messengers to deliver the money to the needy saints). These are all works of lesser significance than the instruction of the local church in the doctrine of God’s Word.

Having set these men apart in the office of teachers, continue to practice mutual edification, but make it essential to train those who participate. Continue to encourage your speakers to develop into teachers. Stay in touch with all of the members. Begin to study and prepare for the eldership.

Remember, God is not the author of confusion, and confusion is what we are experiencing now in many churches. God has left us a plan for immature churches; if we use it we will develop mature churches with biblical and effective elderships. We cannot allow the difficulty of achieving this to deter us. Let us begin where we are and grow from there into mature congregations.

Postscript
Why are so many of our current elderships experiencing such grave difficulties in carrying on the work? I believe we overstress a few qualifications --- husband of one wife; faithful children; not given to wine; apt to teach --- to the neglect of other, equally important qualifications. “These ought ye to have done and not left the other undone.” What of the characteristics of holiness, justice, soberness, vigilance, and not being self-willed?

We have not discussed enough the function of elders. Eldership is a life work. It does not start happening the day a man is ordained. It began when he was a teacher and even before. Men do not become leaders when they are old, if they have not been developing that skill virtually all of their lives.

We have also overlooked the need for elders to be able to resolve the differences among their own number amicably and scripturally.

Most of all, we have overlooked the God-given maturation process. Consequently, we should not be surprised if Acts 20:28-31 comes to pass before our eyes.


11349 Ferrari Ct.,
Manteca, CA 95336

Read more!

About Me

My photo
At one time I was an Agnostic/atheist, not much caring if God existed or not. Then one day I was challenged to examine the evidences of God and the Bible. These are the basic truths I as "Just a Christian" am trying to share with others on these blog-sites: 1) To provide the “evidences” for God and the creation, the infallibility of the Scriptures, and for Jesus Christ as the Lord and savior of mankind. [Hebrews 11:1] 2) To reach the lost with the complete Gospel of Christ and salvation. [Romans 1:16; 2:16; 5:19-20; Galatians 1:7; 2 Thessalonians 1:8-9] 3) To help Christians to grow in their knowledge and faith and the grace of God, and commitment to following Christ. [1 Peter 2:2] 4) To promote and defend the unity of church and the doctrine of Christ. [Mark 7:7-9; John 10:16; Ephesians 4:4-5; 1 Corinthians 1:10] Please e-mail me at BibleTruths@hotmail.com with any comments or suggestions. Thanks, DC